OK, works like a charm within a full Eclipse SDK. Not that there is any reason that it wouldn't but its nice to see. I'm going to play around with some models and I'll report back when I get some agent models working!
On Jul 14, 2010, at 6:36 PM, Jody Garnett wrote:
EPL would be considered as part of a migration to http://code.google.com/a/eclipselabs.org/hosting/. We may however fall within their use of LGPL guidelines. The biggest thing holding us back is not license but the desire to use GIT rather then mercurial.
Yes, I have a non-Eclipse hostable stuff that I was going to move over that way too but that stopped me -- all of the Eclipse projects are moving to Git so it's sort a weird disconnect. I'll be sooo happy to drop SVN.
I asked the licensing question for a somewhat more ambitious reasons -- LGPL isn't on the list of approved inclusion in Eclipse project hosted third-party licenses. :) So, if it were EPL (and assuming clean IP process which it looks like you guys have) I could actually provide dependencies as a component part of AMP from Eclipse host. And, actually, if you were EPL, you could *become* an Eclipse project. Of course, that's either a good thing or a bad thing depending on your POV. But, umm..., we have Git support. ;)
cheers,
Miles |
