Re: [sumo-user] Realistic Simulation with traffic data and calibration

[Tetris <schmelter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hello, 

I used the method with non-consecutive turning relations. 

I got the warning "no routes pass edge" again for a few edgeRelations. But
as I created more random routes with randomtrips.py and p 0.7 instead of p
1, there was no warning. Is this actually a problematic approach?  I
couldn't solve the warning otherwise. Or should I create the missing route
myself and put it in the random routes file? 

The result with p 0.7 was GEH<5 for 91 %.

Wrote 9545 routes (2762 distinct) achieving total count 16695 at 83
locations. GEH<5 for 91.57%
Warning: underflow locations: count 43, min 1.00 (('24654525#8',
'28497111#0')), max 75.00 (('-4540284#2', '4540284#0')), mean 13.98 Q1 2.00,
median 8.00, Q3 21.00 (total 601)
Warning: overflow locations: count 27, min -93.00 (('25184203#0',
'-24678549#1')), max -1.00 (('182604676#2', '182603253#2')), mean -14.30 Q1
-16.00, median -5.00, Q3 -2.00 (total -386)

I wanted to improve the result by using --optimize-input  on the output.
(https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Tools/Turns.html#further_calibration)

routeSampler.py -r  outputOfRS.rou.xml -t turncounts_passenger.xml
--turn-max-gap 8 --optimize-input  -o outputOfRS_cal.rou.xml

But:
Option --optimize-input requires an integer argument for --optimize

What does the integer argument stand for? How should the command look like?
I used "--optimize full" before and got 
"OptimizeWarning: x0 is used only when method is 'revised simplex'.
  warn(warning_message, OptimizeWarning)
Optimization succeeded".




Jakob Erdmann wrote
>  
> 3) In the latest development version, routeSampler provides for two
> different methods to define non-consecutive turning relations (
> https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Tools/Turns.html#generalized_route_restrictions)

 



--
Sent from: http://sumo-user-mailing-list.90755.n8.nabble.com/