[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [technology-pmc] PMC Minutes 3/4/2015
|
Hi all,
As some follow-up questions about our discussion....
Jody had suggested that we find a way to link the Eclipse IPZilla CQ and
the pom on LT's Nexus.
Can someone suggest an update or two to the directions here:
hhttps://wiki.eclipse.org/Services/Nexus#Deploying_artifacts_to_repo.eclipse.org
which would help do that? I'm unsure how to use mvn deploy:deploy-file
(run via Hudson) to achieve our goal.*
Second, when a PR changing a dependency is opened at GitHub, my current
understanding is that I can't accept the PR until the CQs have been
approved for parallel check-in. Is that everyone else's understanding?
Thanks,
Jim
* My first jar/pom was for logback and is here:
https://repo.locationtech.org/content/repositories/thirdparty/ch/qos/logback/logback-classic/1.1.1/logback-classic-1.1.1.pom.
On 03/04/2015 05:17 PM, Jim Hughes wrote:
Hi all,
Here are some brief notes from the PMC meeting today:
Several of us are attending/speaking at FOSS4G; see you there!
Upcoming FOSS4G NA BoF sessions:
https://2015.foss4g-na.org/bof-session/working-geoserver-presented-boundless
https://2015.foss4g-na.org/bof-session/jvm-map-rendering
https://2015.foss4g-na.org/bof-session/making-your-own-terrain-maps
Attendees:
Andrew Ross
David Smiley
Jim Hughes
Jody Garnett
Rob Emanuele
I reported on GeoMesa's status through the IP process. I added some
terse notes here
https://locationtech.org/wiki/The_Nexus#Third-party_Repository about
uploading dependencies which will be bundled in LocationTech released
software.
There was a notion that we ought to include information in the poms
pointing to the relevant CQs.
As a clarification, only 'subset' artifacts require CQ classifiers. If
you get the same jar from Maven Central and LT's Nexus repo, there is
no classifier change.
For works-with and test dependencies, our discussion led to the idea
that we could use a private Nexus proxy for Maven Central (and likely
for the OSGeo repo). I've submitted the bug here:
https://locationtech.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=49.
David reported that he is going again with the IP process to get
Spatial4J through LocationTech incubation. The group approved
GeoMesa's use of Spatial4J.
Jody noted that the JTS jars available at various Maven repos were
bundled by him for GeoTools and contained subsets of JTS. As such, as
we upload these jars, we will reference an appropriate CQ in the
classifier.
Rob reported that he is submitting CQs for GeoTrellis. Additionally,
GeoTrellis will be cutting a 0.10 release before moving their codebase
to the LocationTech Github repo.
He provided an update about the SFCurve project which has a proposal
here: http://www.locationtech.org/proposals/sfcurve.
Jody bumped the BoF sessions of interest to our projects.
Thanks all,
Jim
_______________________________________________
technology-pmc mailing list
technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or
unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://locationtech.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc