Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior

From: Jody Garnett <jgarnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 10:08:05 -0700
Delivered-to: udig-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <http://lists.refractions.net/pipermail/udig-devel>
List-help: <mailto:udig-devel-request@lists.refractions.net?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel>, <mailto:udig-devel-request@lists.refractions.net?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel>, <mailto:udig-devel-request@lists.refractions.net?subject=unsubscribe>
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)

David Adler wrote:

It isn't surprising that the behavior of the filter is different inthe WFS request than in styling. In the WFS request, the datastore isconverting the filter into some SQL. In styling, GeoTools must haveimplemented this filtering.

You are correct; and I am surprised. Can we isolate this problem into aGeoTools test case per chance? Or is there something we are doing wrong?

Jody

References:
- [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior
  - From: David Adler
- Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior
  - From: Jody Garnett
- Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior
  - From: David Adler

Prev by Date: Re: [udig-devel] Connecting to Oracle Express with RC 12
Next by Date: [udig-devel] Menubar and a call to actions
Previous by thread: Re: [udig-devel] Strange SLD behavior
Next by thread: [udig-devel] Consistant GIS image files w/ geo-referencing
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs