[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [udig-devel] Re: WFS bugs in RC8 Fixed
|
It is strange but known. I think there are other mentions of this
issue in the email archive.
Jesse
On 31-Jan-07, at 8:44 AM, Jesse Eichar wrote:
Hi,
This is a strange issue. If you gunzip the file then do the tar
xvf it usually works. But if you try to just use tar to do both it
fails. I'm not sure why that is. Just something we've noticed
Jesse
On 31-Jan-07, at 8:36 AM, Neil Best wrote:
Thanks, Jesse. I was able to surf to
http://udig.refractions.net/nightly/udig/20070130182722/udig-linux-
gtk-x86.tgz
and download what appears to be a malformed archive -- would that be
related to the issues you are investigating? Thanks for working
on the
release. I will watch for it.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [udig-devel] Re: WFS bugs in RC8 Fixed
From: Jesse Eichar <jeichar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, January 31, 2007 9:25 am
To: User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS
<udig-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
I have been trying to connect to a Mapserver WFS with RC8. When I
saw Jesse's
note I wondered if I need to download another build. At this
moment the nightly
build appears to be missing from the site. That is what I want,
right? I
assume that the RC8 download would not change.
That is correct. I gather that the nightly build failed last night
so that is why it is missing. I will be up tonight. I'm also going
to make another release. I just have to further test the changes to
the WMS renderer that cory made.
I recently posted to mapserver-user to find out if anyone has been
successful
using udig as a WFS client, but didn't get any replies about that.
Can anyone
here comment about that? I am also trying QGis and *choke* Arc.
Are there any
other WFS clients out there that I should try? Thanks.
I have used uDig with mapserver's WFS a few times. But I have to
say
that Mapserver's WFS is not very good. A large part of that is
because they do not support post which limits the filters that
can be
sent. I don't think we have a check for that yet so it is possible
for a request to fail because of it. Although that is not common
for
normal usage but could potentially be an issue for rendering
complicated styles.
Jesse
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
