Re: [ve-dev] running sweet

[Dr Gili Mendel <gmendel@xxxxxxxxxx>]

We have a framework from Dave that does
many things in regard to the binding problem;  it is a stand alone
framework.
The sweet2 package, is not a framework.
 Joe has written it quickly so that we can iterate on "the meaning
of bindings", and be able to "touch" it from the JFace component
model.

The effort that we have on the table
going forward, is leveraging Dave's framework using the manner it is used
in the examples in the sweet2 package.


------------
Dr. Gili Mendel
IBM
Software Development
RTP Raleigh, NC
(919)543 6408, tie: 441 6408

Mark Proctor <mproctor@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: ve-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx

09/12/2005 01:43 PM

Please respond to
Discussions people developing code for the Visual Editor project

To	Discussions people developing code for the Visual Editor project <ve-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject	Re: [ve-dev] running sweet

Two frameworks? In the source how do I know which
framework is which? 
I've seen there is sweet1, sweet2 and sweet3. Also are there any quick
ramblings on how these work, to help when delving into the code?

Mark

David J. Orme wrote:

> Mark Proctor wrote:
>
>> Ah thats what you get for skim reading :)
>>
>> I'm spending some time now trying to work out how this data binding
>> stuff works. The Binding Proof of Concept doesn't use the 
>> CompositeTable right and is the only current working example?
Once 
>> I've figured out how this works I'm going to see if its possible
to 
>> shoe horn ktable into this. Well atleast thats the theory, if
I can 
>> get enough time :)
>
>
> FYI: There are actually two frameworks here.
>
> Mine is complete for all the use-cases it currently implements, works,
> and is deployed at two clients of mine--parts for over six months
now 
> and over a hundred sites.  CompositeTable is a part of my framework.
 
> Gili's is a spike solution sketching out some of the API for how you
> could do a binding framework on top of JFace.
>
> Stay tuned for how each framework will eventually be used/deployed.
 
> We're right now in the process of working that out.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave Orme
>

_______________________________________________
ve-dev mailing list
ve-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ve-dev