Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type

Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence

On 2018-03-14 10:07 AM, Jay Jay Billings wrote:

We are still reviewing the EPL v2, but I hope to adopt it for ICE IIIas well.

We consider EPL-2.0 to be a much better license than EPL-1.0. If yourreviewers have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask for ourassistance.


--
Mike Milinkovich
mike.milinkovich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
(m) +1.613.220.3223

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
  - From: Jay Jay Billings

References:
- [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
  - From: Jay Jay Billings
- Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
  - From: Christopher Brooks
- Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
  - From: Jay Jay Billings
- Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
  - From: Greg Watson
- Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
  - From: Mike Milinkovich
- Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
  - From: Jay Jay Billings