Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
Thanks for the thoughts Christopher. I see it much the same way coming from the Lab and our corporate partners don't care about this issue very much. 

I am asking for opinions on this to evaluate the possibility and value of making the next version of ICE type A under EPL 2.

Jay

On Mar 13, 2018 18:02, "Christopher Brooks" <cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Type B is "better" than A, but B can be difficult if the tree is large and there are many contributors.

I see the main value of Type B in being that corporations might be more inclined to use Type B software than Type A software in their product.

However, the effort to meet Type B compliance can be large and could take away from other efforts.

For me, working in academia, Type A is sufficient.

_Christopher


On 3/13/18 11:08 AM, Jay Jay Billings wrote:
Everyone,

Do you have any thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence? In type A, licenses are checked for compatibility. Type B is the classic IP policy that includes the full provenance check in addition to the license check of type A.

Jay

--
Jay Jay Billings
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings


_______________________________________________
science-pmc mailing list
science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc


-- 
Christopher Brooks, PMP
Academic Program Manager
iCyPhy/Ptolemy/TerraSwarm
University of California, Berkeley
707.332.0670, cxh@xxxxxxxxxxxx, https://ptolemy.eecs.berkeley.edu/~cxh

Back to the top