[science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B I

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

[science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence

From: Jay Jay Billings <jayjaybillings@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2018 14:08:07 -0400
Delivered-to: science-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/science-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:science-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-pmc>, <mailto:science-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/options/science-pmc>, <mailto:science-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>

Everyone,

Do you have any thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence? In type A, licenses are checked for compatibility. Type B is the classic IP policy that includes the full provenance check in addition to the license check of type A.

Jay

Jay Jay Billings

Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Twitter Handle: @jayjaybillings

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
  - From: Christopher Brooks

Prev by Date: [science-pmc] Science TLP Charter updated with addendum
Next by Date: Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
Previous by thread: [science-pmc] Science TLP Charter updated with addendum
Next by thread: Re: [science-pmc] Thoughts on projects switching between type A and type B IP due diligence
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs