| Re: [ee4j-pmc] Release process |
_______________________________________________No I think it is a Platform project or spec committee decision for spec projects. My recollection it isn’t a EE4J wide thing.
From: ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Ivar Grimstad
Sent: 17 January 2020 08:36
To: EE4J PMC Discussions <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [ee4j-pmc] Release process
On Fri, Jan 17, 2020 at 9:24 AM Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Wayne Beaton wrote on 1/15/20 9:16 AM:
> I believe, however, that the Eclipse EE4J PMC requires their projects to use
> Semantic Versioning. If we don't have this written down somewhere, we probably
> should.
I really hope that's not true.
Semantic versioning is a good idea, a really good idea, but having strict
semantic versioning be the law is going a step too far.
I cannot recall any decision in the PMC to require semantic versioning. I think we said that we encourage it somewhere, but I cannot find it in the minutes right now.
Ivar
_______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc
--
Ivar Grimstad
Jakarta EE Developer Advocate | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc