Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ee4j-pmc] Release process
  • From: "Steve Millidge (Payara)" <steve.millidge@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 12:19:10 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-GB, en-US
  • Arc-authentication-results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=payara.fish; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=payara.fish; dkim=pass header.d=payara.fish; arc=none
  • Arc-message-signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=GPpaJ7LP0xip4GauyyYCIzYVQokxZQ6n95LShkBFm0Y=; b=TVwHoUUc9vu4Alg33T4Ic44OYDnu0TQHF7zCu+5gsBbNQxoLzOUX7vJVUjCXXInlozcC8dF3E5KOtNXxvCsrNJihXNKkakyp14nYgKgDypxEQRMmzY9nlgFZTXjCf1Z8iCIJj5sQ4TTSgHJCrkNP89h8eE2FdYJfW6BplQRI4T6jLTXMP3dqJltypf3BuaRIRi/luo3zKVC8r4gFEo8gukeGuKbVHP3Gjn2VkLJOhwiarE75TlftFevk92Dd4cD5kXgF58S5UTWP47dzDsMWQsnKacAyG76SYp7VMTIu+YI2OVn0nJek3LtI3iJqlWbMNw54X2Lpq7VmKrCJtYNIsw==
  • Arc-seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=kQlU58rH/HaUZAb3EYStkzLuH3wqImK3R6dUyzSTKvP0R4jqwPcDyWOFXUMrpU+hRE6Lbl2rHOURQKtA2bXvNah/wex2YlRpNfPts/tRG0v0qLVceaJT467TYQxX9S01GYFje5+nYsrdOJg03GFx0Stc2s3Viu8lMhOKOg3v8htBBMlnxcidEaAe2cJihW6FEBDs+UYizCOD2dI004wwFEjUq+1fmgu8bSRgOaKR+aTtBWaVCfUJwnS05WibhLcnHlKShlMmLGZQkSzWROdd1dD6wEnz6ks64E4HgDrHTbM39tgRBtgrc/HGmincAn/nRQq9Z1LdJID2VFK3q0DrTg==
  • Delivered-to: ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • List-archive: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/private/ee4j-pmc>
  • List-help: <mailto:ee4j-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
  • List-subscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc>, <mailto:ee4j-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
  • List-unsubscribe: <https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/options/ee4j-pmc>, <mailto:ee4j-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
  • Thread-index: AQHVyTu0wVZ2hmibY0ab7/BDuig+6Kfog4mg
  • Thread-topic: [ee4j-pmc] Release process

I am not an expert on the process so I could be wrong but my understanding is that once a project has a successful release review it can make further releases for a year without a formal review. I assume a release record is still required though but Wayne or Ivar can correct me.

 

I just googled and this blog seems to also say the same https://blogs.eclipse.org/post/wayne-beaton/progress-and-release-reviews

 

Steve

 

From: ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx <ee4j-pmc-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Christian Kaltepoth
Sent: 12 January 2020 11:30
To: EE4J community discussions <ee4j-community@xxxxxxxxxxx>; EE4J PMC Discussions <ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [ee4j-pmc] Release process

 

Hi all,

 

I'm currently working on the first Eclipse Krazo release. As this is our first release under the umbrella of the EE4J project, I would like to ask a few questions about the process, especially regarding release reviews.

 

I just checked the project site of Eclipse Jersey, because I was interested to see how other projects are doing it. Eclipse Jersey published versions like 2.28, 2.29 or 2.29.1. So it looks like they are following the "major.minor" and "major.minor.patch" versioning scheme. The Eclipse Project Handbook states:

 

All major and minor releases require a review. Service releases [...] do not require a review.

 

There was a release review for the 2.28 release. That's fine. But there wasn't one for the 2.29 release. But isn't this required for a non-service release? There is also only an IP Log for 2.28 but not for 2.29.

 

Also, Eclipse Jersey released 2.30 a few days ago and the release is already available in Maven Central. However, there isn't any entry for 2.30 in the "Latest Releases" table on the Jersey project site. So it looks like there isn't any release plan and also no release review for 2.30.

 

Am I missing something here?

 

Christian

 

 

--

Back to the top