[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
[cdt-dev] Target/Build Model
|
That sounds like a good idea to add to the discussion.
One comment about the relationship between the target model and the build
model....
The build model needs to know how to get commands that build for a
particular target. If you are building for Xtensa processors, for example,
you need to use the xtensa versions of gcc et al. So I think that the build
model needs to know about the target model, even if it's not the target
model itself.
Thanks!
-Chris
At 02:27 PM 6/30/2003 -0500, Phil Muldoon wrote:
In reference to Chris Songer, Anthony Green and Doug's comments on the
target system (objdump/add2line) can we have a quick round up there -
and non native toolchain's target support? Doug mentioned something
along the lines of sketching out a target model there, and not
overloading the build model. Though this might already be addressed in
"Discussion of other framework/features" agenda item
Regards
Phil Muldoon
On Mon, 2003-06-30 at 08:58, John Camelon wrote:
> I second that emotion!
>
> JohnC
>
>
>
> Sebastien Marineau
> <sebastien@xxxxxxx>
> Sent by: cdt-dev-admin@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
> 06/30/2003 09:05 AM
> Please respond to
> cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To
> "'cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx'" <cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> cc
>
> Subject
> RE: [cdt-dev]
> Next CDT
> Conference Call
>
>
>
>
> Hi Kleo,
>
> My preference would be to hold this on the 9th, as I'll be away this
> week, but if other
> folks prefer to do it this week, that is fine as well.
>
> One of the other topics I'd like to bring up for discussion is to get
> an update on the testing
> plan, as well as discuss how we can get Mathieu/Brent's great test
> plans broadened and posted
> up on the web site.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Sebastien
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kleanthis Hapitas [mailto:khapitas@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 12:17 PM
> To: cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [cdt-dev] Next CDT Conference Call
>
>
> All,
>
> We've talked about wanting to get back onto having monthly CDT
> conference calls on the first Wednesday of every month. That would
> make the next call on Wednesday July 2. Given the holidays (both in
> Canada and the US) next week, we may not have many participants. If
> the people who usually dial in to these calls feel that next week
> would not make sense, we could put the call off until the week after
> (July 9).
>
> For now l'll assume that the call will take place as planned on July
> 2, and if I start to see responses that we should delay it I'll send
> out another email to that effect.
>
> Meeting Agenda:
>
> - Program level updates
> - CDT 1.2 content
> - CDT 1.2 schedule
> - CDT 2.0 timing
>
> - Participant updates (around the virtual table)
>
> - Discussion of other frameworks/features (not already covered as part
> of the CDT 1.2 discussion)
>
> - Infrastructure
> - Builds
> - Web Site
>
> - Documentation
>
> - Verification
>
> - Other
>
> Conference Call details are:
>
> Dial-in: 1 866 680 0993 (international: 1 865 297 1125)
> Participant Code: 940468
>
> Cheers,
>
> Kleo Hapitas
> Program Manager
> IBM Software Group - Rational
> Tel: (613) 591 2913
--
Phil Muldoon <pmuldoon@xxxxxxxxxx>
Red Hat, Inc.
_______________________________________________
cdt-dev mailing list
cdt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
http://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cdt-dev
