[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Why fragements? I'm not a fan of fragments at all, e.g. they are causing
problems when building with tycho, ... .
Tom
Am 25.09.12 09:16, schrieb Alexander Nyßen:
> Hi Tom,
>
> great you are contributing that! Concerning the SWT dependencies, we had in mind to put the SWT-dependent things into fragments. That's the reason we already refactored everything, so that SWT dependencies within the geometry component are now only located within the respective transformation package. Maybe I can factor that out by next week.
>
> Cheers
> Alexander
>
> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>
> Am 24.09.2012 um 20:25 schrieb Tom Schindl <tom.schindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ok - writing the rendering for FX using the JavaFX-Canvas API was really
>> easy ;-)
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Am 24.09.12 18:31, schrieb Tom Schindl:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> just checked out the git-repo to see what would be needed to make JavaFX
>>> a supported technology for GEF4.
>>>
>>> The first thing that strikes me a bit is that the bundles:
>>> * org.eclipse.gef4.geometry
>>> * org.eclipse.gef4.graphics
>>>
>>> hold an SWT dependency. For geometry this makes no sense IMHO and this
>>> one should not depend at all on SWT. For the graphics one I'd suggest to
>>> split it in:
>>> * org.eclipse.gef4.graphics
>>> * org.eclipse.gef4.graphics.swt
>>> * org.eclipse.gef4.graphics.awt
>>> * org.eclipse.gef4.graphics....
>>>
>>> At least the SWT-Dependency should be optional else OSGi will require me
>>> to always have org.eclipse.swt available which makes no sense if I'm
>>> writing a pure JavaFX or Swing/AWT application.
>>>
>>> Having no SWT-Dependency is preferred so it is not possible at all to
>>> introduce one.
>>>
>>> Like mentioned already on the bug in JavaFX one often does not uses
>>> direct drawing but constructs a Scene-Graph of Nodes so that one can
>>> transform, animate them inside the Scene-Graph instead of doing it on
>>> the CPU when using DirectDrawing (Canvas).
>>>
>>> Should I create an new bug where I dump my JavaFX implementation? I
>>> think in the first take I'll implement it through a JavaFX-Canvas but
>>> ideally the final one is done as nodes inside the SceneGraph.
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> tom schindl geschäftsführer/CEO
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1 A-6020 innsbruck fax ++43 512 935833
>> http://www.BestSolution.at phone ++43 512 935834
>> <gef_fx.png>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gef-dev mailing list
>> gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gef-dev
> _______________________________________________
> gef-dev mailing list
> gef-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gef-dev
>
--
B e s t S o l u t i o n . a t EDV Systemhaus GmbH
------------------------------------------------------------------------
tom schindl geschäftsführer/CEO
------------------------------------------------------------------------
eduard-bodem-gasse 5-7/1 A-6020 innsbruck fax ++43 512 935833
http://www.BestSolution.at phone ++43 512 935834
