Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [viatra-dev] [458324] Build job restructure

Also: the org.eclipse.viatra.emf.runtime.feature project should be renamed to org.eclipse.viatra.emf.feature, as there will be DSL, UI and other plugins related to the same module (EMF).
Please, let me know what do you think and I'll handle the renaming.

In the meantime, the build jobs have been renamed as discussed.


2015-02-01 21:44 GMT+01:00 David, Istvan <davidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
In other words, I am in favor of removing both the emf and the '2' from the job names
What about the releng projects?
-org.eclipse.viatra.emf.parent
-org.eclipse.viatra.emf.target
-org.eclipse.viatra.emf.update
I think they should be renamed as well.



2015-02-01 19:18 GMT+01:00 Ujhelyi Zoltán <ujhelyiz@xxxxxxxxxx>:
Hi,

first of all, lets not copy existing jobs (unless really needed of course :) ). If I recall correctly, Hudson allows renaming jobs in a relative painless way, and that way, we retain the build history as well. Of course, this would break the hudson-based update site urls, but I don't think we should care about that.

To be more constructive: yes, the emf part in the job name is really misleading, and it is legacy now. When the job was created, this distinction was necessary to the build job of the VPM-based implementation (on the other hand, that job could also be turned off... :) ). In other words, I am in favor of removing both the emf and the '2' from the job names.

Cheers,
Zoli
-- Zoltán Ujhelyi
https://www.inf.mit.bme.hu/en/members/ujhelyiz

Fault Tolerant Systems Research Group
Budapest University of Technology and Economics

> On 2015. febr. 1., at 16:11, David, Istvan <davidi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> We should discuss how to restructure the build jobs at Hudson. The least we should do is to rename them accordingly (*.viatra2.* -> *.viatra.*), but it seems like we have some old/unused jobs as well.
>
> I made a copy of the "viatra2-emf-master" under the name "viatra-master" and removed the hourly SCM poll, so it's only manual. No problems detected, so these tasks shouldn't cause too much problem.
>
> Question: do we want to keep the "emf" segment in the job names and the releng plugins? This is currently somewhat misleading, as the EMF plugin is the actual transformation plugin, the DSE and CEP modules, on the other hand, do not feature this segment in their names. Thus it would make sense to remove the "emf" segment from the common project names and the job names as well.
> What do you think?
>
> Cheers,
> Istvan
> _______________________________________________
> viatra-dev mailing list
> viatra-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/viatra-dev

_______________________________________________
viatra-dev mailing list
viatra-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/viatra-dev



Back to the top