| Re: [udig-devel] location tech initial contribution update |
Hi Frank,
I am a bit stuck in the usual back from abroad mess, but if you
organize an IRC Meeting to push on these, I will be part of it and
finally solve the problems.
Obviously if there are still LGPLs on my code, then it is a missing, I
intended to change them all to the right license. So if they pass your
way, feel free to change them.
Cheers,
Andrea
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 9:43 AM, Frank Gasdorf
<fgdrf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Updated the spreadsheet
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AtOHw31i-Ij_dDVfOHVWQV9lXzVjaFNwR2xpcWF6cHc#gid=0:
>
> * added new status "needs review" and added "blue" formating for this value
> --> see comments in the last column
>
> Progress:
> * changed several LGPL references to EPL + BSD
> * added/ updated copyright informations for Extension point definitions
> (exsd)
> * updated copyrightText for Project.genmodel
> * updated License.txt files
> * removed several historical txt-files
> * removed hfb-v10.txt (no references in sources, maybe in 3rd-party libs
> like geotools --> can we go ahead and remove SOSNOKILLINGLICENSE.txt as
> well?)
>
> Question:
> * How do we handle *-screen files (created with WireframeSketchers). These
> are ecore-model files but are not required at runtime. We used it to
> document RFC's initial UI ideas. Remove these?
> * Andrea, when can we start to update eu.udig.tools java source headers
> (LGPL)? I could help if required!
>
> How can we synchronize our tasks (see status "in progress" of the
> spreadsheet). Who will communicate with Eclipse IP team (tasks with "needs
> review" status) and when will we provide the next initial contribution?
>
> I'd like to suggest a weekly IRC session kind of stand-up of the IP
> progress. Any suggestions for the timetable?
>
> Cheers
>
> - Frank
>
>
>
> 2013/5/23 Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> It is not a requirement, I will just explain it is a freely available tool
>> (license required to unlock more functionality ).
>>
>> --
>> Jody Garnett
>>
>> On 20/05/2013, at 10:43 PM, Frank Gasdorf <fgdrf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Got back second round of feedback, this time very detailed. > > Looks
>> > like we have: > - a number of files still marked LGPL (mostly eu.udig.tools)
>> > > - and a few section with with GPL in the header (JGrass mostly), and
>> > SLDValidator we will have to remove (or get pushed into GeoTools) > - a few
>> > mentions of swear words in the comments to clean up! > - all my wireframe
>> > sketcher diagrams
>>
>> To bad, i like wireframe sketchers and I don't know why its required to
>> remove these. Well, a license is required but so what?!
>>
>> > I will try and put the document up in google docs for PSC members to
>> > look at, and make a plan of attack.
>>
>> Done. Link has been sent. Some rows are already done, mostly lgpl stuff
>> from last 8 or 10 commits on locationtech_ip branch. Going to add pmc's
>> tomorrow and Update the current Status as well.
>>
>> > All in all much better then our first attempt, thanks for the hard work
>> > on dependencies Frank. > > --> Jody Garnett
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
>> http://udig.refractions.net
>> http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel
>
>
_______________________________________________
User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig)
http://udig.refractions.net
http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel