Re: [udig-devel] [Geotools-devel] GridCoverageRenderer API change?

[Andrea Aime <aaime@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Jesse Eichar ha scritto:
> Its not a big deal.  Don't let uDig hold up fixes.  We can track until 
> we get something stable.  I just didn't realize that it was a risk 
> factor.  I will update uDig now that I know that it is not published 
> API.  

It's actually just my impression about the class, but we don't
have set in stone rules to identify classes that we need to be public
for some reason, but we don't want to commit to interface wise.

> I can look at using LiteRenderer again but I wish I knew why we 
> stopped using it.  Originally we used LiteRenderer to render coverages 
> then I think Cory changed it when he was doing some work on it.  I don't 
> know what his reason was.  I wouldn't be surprised if it doesnt apply 
> anymore.  I am CCing the uDig list and maybe someone can remind me.
>
> In the mean time I am just patching uDig to work with the new 
> GridCoverageRenderer.

Thanks and sorry for the issue
Cheers
Andrea

> Jesse
>
> On Mon, Aug 24, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Andrea Aime <aaime@xxxxxxxxxxx 
> <mailto:aaime@xxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>
>     Jesse Eichar ha scritto:
>
>         Hi,
>
>         Did the GridCoverageRenderer constructor just change?  I am
>         suddenly getting compile errors in uDig.
>
>
>     It did:
>
>     http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2534
>
>     Never really considered GridCoverageRenderer as published API,
>     people are supposed to go through a GTRenderer to render maps.
>     If you  want we can add back a backwards compatible version?
>
>     Cheers
>     Andrea
>
>     -- 
>     Andrea Aime
>     OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
>     Expert service straight from the developers.


--
Andrea Aime
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.