Re: [Geotools-devel] [udig-devel] udig trunk on trunk - documentation ne

["Simone" <simboss1@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ciao Martin,
there might be a little confusion here, but don't worry, I have not renamed
anything you are using :-), I know you are relying on these classes for
SeaGis ( I catually was looking at it a couple of hours ago,
is there some support for hdf somewhere in there? I am playing with hdf
these days and I want to share that..), I have just moved them under spike
waiting for you to review and decide what to do ( a plugin? Merge somewhere
with another plugin? ).

Please take a quick look here:
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Cleaning+up+dependencies+between+various+modules+and+coverage
http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Cleaning+up+dependencies+between+various+modules+and+coverage
and here
http://svn.geotools.org/geotools/trunk/spike/exoreferenced/

Thx,
Simone.
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Simone Giannecchini

President/CEO GeoSolutions
http://www.geo-solutions.it
Via Carignoni 51
550141 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
Mobile: +39 333 81 28928
------------------------------------------------------------ Original 
Message ----- 
From: "Martin Desruisseaux" <martin.desruisseaux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Andrea Aime" <aaime@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS" <udig-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
"geotools-devel" <geotools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 28, 2007 5:11 PM
Subject: Re: [Geotools-devel] [udig-devel] udig trunk on trunk - 
documentation needed on Decimator, LiteShape2, LiteShape


Andrea Aime a écrit :
> Afaik org.geotools.coverage.io became org.geotools.coverage.grid.io.

The package name changed? I though that the work was just about moving
"org.geotools.coverage.io" out of "coverage" module, in a new plugin module? 
I
didn't know that a package name change was planned in the process?

I suggest to keep the "org.geotools.coverage.io" package name in the new 
plugin
module... If we want to change the package name, we way try to deprecate 
them first.

I think that nobody used "GridCoverageExchange", but it is not exact that 
nobody
use "org.geotools.coverage.io". I do use it in the Seagis project. I just
considered that it is not a suffisient reason to keep this package in core
coverage module.

Martin

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share your
opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
_______________________________________________
Geotools-devel mailing list
Geotools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel