[udig-devel] Re: [Geotools-devel] udig trunk on trunk

["Simone" <simboss1@xxxxxxxxx>]

Ciao Jody,
yeah that's me :-).
Whenever we talked about these classes everybody was saying that nobody was 
using them hence I
proposed to just remove them. without moving them to coverage. If we want to 
strictly follow the
guidelines there is no problem we can restore these classes in the coverage 
module so that people won't have any problems.

Ciao Simone.
-------------------------------------------------------
Eng. Simone Giannecchini

President/CEO GeoSolutions
http://www.geo-solutions.it
Via Carignoni 51
550141 Camaiore (LU)
Italy
Mobile: +39 333 81 28928
-------------------------------------------------------
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jody Garnett" <jgarnett@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS" <udig-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; 
"geotools-devel" <geotools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, February 27, 2007 10:58 PM
Subject: [Geotools-devel] udig trunk on trunk


> Some initial feedback ...
>
> The following packages no longer exist (uDig was explicitly exporting 
> them):
> - org.geotools.coverage.io
> - org.geotools.data.coverage.grid.file
> - org.geotools.data.coverage.grid.stream
>
> I suspect these were line items on Simone's greatest hits page:
> -
> http://docs.codehaus.org/display/GEOTOOLS/Cleaning+up+dependencies+between+various+modules+and+coverage
>
> Jody
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share 
> your
> opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys-and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Geotools-devel mailing list
> Geotools-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel