[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [udig-devel] uDig move to Geotools "stylish" branch
|
Cory Horner wrote:
No worries; i'm sure others are curious as well.
Thanks Cory.
At the moment, Jody and I are reviewing the Geotools
StyledLayerDescriptor API. We're adding documentation and methods,
and moving interfaces around (geotools just added a module for
interfaces only... so we're moving the sld interfaces over to it
too). At the same time we're making changes so we conform with the
SLD 1.0.0 specification, and to GeoAPI 2.0.
Well we are not conforming with GeoAPI 2.0, we tried earlier in the week
and figured out we cannot do it until GeoTools uses Java 5 :-(
What we are doing is providing as many of the same method names as
possible, so when a change occurs we can just update the import
statements.
This gets a little confusing as the GeoAPI 2.0 naming convention
seems to diverge from the SLD spec at some points (naming follows
1.0.20?).
This would be the other reason we are not tracking GeoAPI 2.0 :-)
Normally we would just keep working on trunk (when the changes are
done), but another developer has asked us to wait
until early next week.
Jody
