Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [triquetrum-dev] Ptolemy implementation for relation reconnecting away from a vertex

Thank you, it's done now in Triquetrum as well.

regards
erwin



Op 09/04/2016 om 13:31 schreef Edward A. LEE:
Vergil works like this:

If the dragging is from port to port, then you should create a new relation.
If the dragging is from port to relation or vice versa, then you
should use the existing relation.

Edward

---------
Edward A. Lee
EECS, UC Berkeley
eal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Apr 7, 2016, at 8:51 AM, Erwin de Ley <erwin.de.ley@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dear ptolemy hackers,

I'm almost there to implement Ptolemy II's "vertex" relation concept (a.k.a. the black diamond) in Triquetrum's editor.

There's one last remaining issue (as far as I know now) : when reconnecting a link away from a vertex, I still need to figure out how/where to decide whether to assign a new relation to the link or not.

E.g. starting from :
<hijccdcj.png>
there is 1 relation linking Const via the Vertex to the Display actor.

After reconnecting to the Display2 actor, the result in Vergil is a new relation2 :
<icgbdibh.png>

In the current Triquetrum status, the result is still the single, but graphically disconnected, relation that now somehow links Const to both Display actors.
I.e. the reconnect action does not create a new relation2.

Could you point me to where to look in Ptolemy's code to figure out all the possible reconnection cases and how to decide when creating a new relation is required?

thanks!
erwin




This message is sent via the ptolemy-hackers mailing list, see
https://lists.eecs.berkeley.edu/sympa/info/ptolemy-hackers



Back to the top