Re: [technology-pmc] first Subversive build

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]

Re: [technology-pmc] first Subversive build - question

From: Bjorn Freeman-Benson <bjorn.freeman-benson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:40:42 -0800
Delivered-to: technology-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
List-archive: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/private/technology-pmc>
List-help: <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=help>
List-subscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/technology-pmc>, <mailto:technology-pmc-request@eclipse.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Organization: Eclipse Foundation Inc.
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031)

Title: New Page 1

Milestone builds do not need a Release Review -- only official "Releases". So if you are producing 3.6M1 then that's a milestone = no Review needed. If you are producing 3.6 then that's a release = yes a Review is needed.

Igor Vinnykov wrote:

I have a question regarding the process. Is it right that Technology Project can start stable builds publishing and announcement without passing of Release Review?

--
[end of message]

References:
- [technology-pmc] first Subversive build - question
  - From: Igor Vinnykov

Prev by Date: [technology-pmc] Re: discussion - automatic error report in Subversive
Next by Date: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Al Heitman
Previous by thread: RE: [technology-pmc] first Subversive build - question
Next by thread: [technology-pmc] PMC approval needed for committer vote for Moritz Post
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Breadcrumbs