| Re: [sw360-dev] We finally made it: initial commit is in Eclipse repo |
hello, just a question: it is on purpose that we are not sw360portal, but sw360? +1 for maximilians proposal but we would need to put that in the wiki if there are no concerns. Kind regards, Michael > On 18.04.2018, at 12:04, Maximilian Huber <maximilian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi sw360-dev@, > > It might also be good to introduce a naming convention for branches. This might > help us to keep everything clean. > > Maybe something like > > <github-nickname>/<issue>/<description> > > Which helps us to see who is responsible and to which issue the PR corresponds > (and thus see if the related issue is already closed and so on). > > So some might be called > > maxhbr/#123/fix > maxhbr/#324/addNewDatamodelThing > > What do you think about this idea? > > Best regards > Maximilian > > -- > Maximilian Huber * maximilian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxx * +49-174-3410223 > TNG Technology Consulting GmbH, Betastr. 13a, 85774 Unterföhring > Geschäftsführer: Henrik Klagges, Dr. Robert Dahlke, Gerhard Müller > Sitz: Unterföhring * Amtsgericht München * HRB 135082 > _______________________________________________ > sw360-dev mailing list > sw360-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit > https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/sw360-dev
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail