Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [science-iwg] Review BoF EclipseCon


Before everyone gets too committed to this namespace, let's check with Wayne Beaton. My recollection is that the current recommendation is that project namespaces be simply org.eclipse.projectname, and not include the top-level project. 

But Wayne's the guy who knows :)


From: Jay Jay Billings
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2013 5:44 PM
To: Science Industry Working Group
Reply To: Science Industry Working Group
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Review BoF EclipseCon

+1 from me too for org.eclipse.science.

Jay

On Nov 5, 2013 4:44 PM, "UOMo" <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just to add, I also feel OK with the package hierarchy suggestions other than the name of the project top level;-)

Werner

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
        science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
        science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Review BoF EclipseCon (Stephan Druskat)
   2. Re: Review BoF EclipseCon (Torkild U. Resheim)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:01:44 +0100
From: Stephan Druskat <stephan.druskat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Review BoF EclipseCon
Message-ID: <20131105210144.57790v7t4keb96zk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"

Hi All,

+1 for org.eclipse.science.*, just because it's nice and generic and
probably un-trademark-able.

Other than that I like Matt & Philip's suggestions.

Cheers,
Stephan
--
Stephan Druskat
stephan.druskat@xxxxxxxxxxx


Zitat von UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Just saw, Scisoft or the ESO (EU Observatory) software artifact is even
> called "eclipse", too, http://www.eso.org/sci/software/eclipse/ for obvious
> reasons, it deals with Solar or Lunar Eclipse observation, there is no
> evidence of Eclipse software being used, but that makes the combination of
> "eclipse" and "scisoft" even more irritating.
>
> Especiallly that looks like a very professional and well-established
> project, even if there may not be a trademark.
>
> Werner

_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg


_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg

Back to the top