Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [science-iwg] Review BoF EclipseCon

+1 from me too for org.eclipse.science.

Jay

On Nov 5, 2013 4:44 PM, "UOMo" <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Just to add, I also feel OK with the package hierarchy suggestions other than the name of the project top level;-)

Werner

On Tue, Nov 5, 2013 at 9:45 PM, <science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Send science-iwg mailing list submissions to
        science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        science-iwg-request@xxxxxxxxxxx

You can reach the person managing the list at
        science-iwg-owner@xxxxxxxxxxx

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of science-iwg digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Re: Review BoF EclipseCon (Stephan Druskat)
   2. Re: Review BoF EclipseCon (Torkild U. Resheim)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Tue, 05 Nov 2013 21:01:44 +0100
From: Stephan Druskat <stephan.druskat@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [science-iwg] Review BoF EclipseCon
Message-ID: <20131105210144.57790v7t4keb96zk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed"

Hi All,

+1 for org.eclipse.science.*, just because it's nice and generic and
probably un-trademark-able.

Other than that I like Matt & Philip's suggestions.

Cheers,
Stephan
--
Stephan Druskat
stephan.druskat@xxxxxxxxxxx


Zitat von UOMo <uomo@xxxxxxxxxxx>:

> Just saw, Scisoft or the ESO (EU Observatory) software artifact is even
> called "eclipse", too, http://www.eso.org/sci/software/eclipse/ for obvious
> reasons, it deals with Solar or Lunar Eclipse observation, there is no
> evidence of Eclipse software being used, but that makes the combination of
> "eclipse" and "scisoft" even more irritating.
>
> Especiallly that looks like a very professional and well-established
> project, even if there may not be a trademark.
>
> Werner

_______________________________________________
science-iwg mailing list
science-iwg@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/science-iwg

Back to the top