Skip to main content

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [ptp-dev] PBS resource manager

Hi Folks,

Any contributions need to happen asap in order to complete the legal process before the release. Even if you don't have a fully working plugin, it's better to get it submitted than wait until it's too late.

A reminder that to contribute to PTP, you need to create a bug in Bugzilla (you will need to get a Bugzilla id first from here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/createaccount.cgi). When you have an account, open a bug against Tools/PTP and whatever component is appropriate (probably *Core* in this case). Choose a severity of "enhancement" and some appropriate summary and a description.You can then attach a patch to the bug, either as a file you've already created, or from the clipboard if you're filing the bug using Mylyn. Please generate the patch using the "Team>Create Patch..." menu.

You will be required to submit a signed Employee Consent Form (http://www.eclipse.org/legal/committer_process/employer_consent.pdf) the first time you contribute something. If you're planning a submission (even if it's some time in the future) I suggest getting this form signed *now* since in many organizations it can take some time.

Thanks,
Greg

On Oct 7, 2009, at 3:01 AM, Siew Hoon Leong wrote:

Hi Thomas and Al,

The way LRZ modified JSch(0.1.41) is simply to extend globus support. Like Thomas says, we have to replace the current JSch plugin
com.jcraft.jsch_{version}. In addition, a Globus plugin is created (only required if one wishes to have gsissh support).
Without tje globus plugin, the existing JSch features will continue to function as usual.

I am not sure if this is the best way to go. As far as I can tell from JSch style of coding, they seem to prefer a one jar solution where all dependent libraries are modified and
integrated into Package com.jcraft.

Yes, I would try to integrate it to PTP 3.0 (on my TODO).

Cheers,
Cerlane

Albert L. Rossi wrote:
Hello Thomas,

These are valid points which I would have had to deal with if I were to modify our (NCSA) "plug-in" as well, which currently neither defines nor contributes to extension points (the original work I did on extending Jsch with the org.globus security packages was not directed primarily at Eclipse development).

At this point I am not sure what route the consensus wishes to take on this, though, so I will defer to others for a decision (perhaps we can discuss this on the next call).

thank you, Al

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
"History does not repeat itself, but often it rhymes." (attr. Mark Twain)

----- Thomas Köckerbauer <tkoeck@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  
Hello

There is also something like this in g-Eclipse (this was also created on 
request by LRZ), there is a patched plugin at

http://savannah.fzk.de/cgi-
bin/viewcvs.cgi/fzk/geclipse/geclipse/development/com.jcraft.jsch/

This in this case it adds the globus toolkit as source for the certificate but 
this can easily be extended to use other x509 certificates.

The only problem about that is that the original jsch plugin does not provide 
any extension point to add such a functionality since it only packages the 
jsch jar file (which can also not be extended by that functionality using a a 
plugin fragment because of the way it resolves classes).

So the only way to get it running is to replace the normal Eclipse jsch plugin 
completely.

The Eclipse way to integrate the functionality, which would be the most 
desirable, would be to change the normal Eclipse jsch plugin to provide some 
mechanism to extend it. If you are planing to go into that direction please 
keep me updated because I would also like to use that solution in g-Eclipse 
then.


Kind Regards,
Thomas


On Tuesday 06 October 2009 16:11:07 Albert L. Rossi wrote:
    
Hi Cerlane,

Thanks for your note.  I'm posting this reply to the group because I
 believe it will be of general interest.

Several years ago I hacked up a version of JSch to support X.509
 certificates, because I needed it for a workflow system and file transport
 library I have developed here at NCSA.  Greg Watson expressed an interest
 in making this available to PTP, which would require me to do a little bit
 of refactoring.

However, if you already have such a plug-in for PTP 2.1, I'm sure that
 integrating it directly into PTP 3.0 would be the easiest route!

Best,

Al Rossi


*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
"History does not repeat itself, but often it rhymes." (attr. Mark Twain)

----- Siew Hoon Leong <Siew-Hoon.Leong@xxxxxx> wrote:
      
Hi,

I am Cerlane from LRZ. I understand from Guisseppe (Cineca) that you are
working on a JSCH plugin that supports X.509. In fact, I have already
done and integrated it into PTP 2.1 approximately two months ago.
Is this of interest to you?

rgds,
Cerlane

Albert L. Rossi wrote:
        
Hello everyone,

My name is Al(bert) Rossi; I am a Research Programmer at NCSA (National
Center for Supercomputing Applications) at U. of Illinois, Urbana,
currently working as a member of the Blue Waters software team.  I have
been developing full-time in Java for a little over 7 years now, and in
Eclipse for about 4.

As a new participant in ptp-dev, my current, modest goal is to
contribute the missing launch functionality to the PBSResourceManager
plug-ins (org.eclipse.ptp.rm.pbs.proxy, org.eclipse.ptp.rm.pbs.core,
org.eclipse.ptp.rm.pbs.ui).

If anyone else is already working on this, or wishes to collaborate, I
would be quite happy to discuss this with her.

Thank you for your attention,

Al

*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*
"History does not repeat itself, but often it rhymes." (attr. Mark
Twain) _______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
          
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev

      
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev

    
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev
  
_______________________________________________
ptp-dev mailing list
ptp-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ptp-dev


Back to the top