Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] quality activation

["charles+zeligsoft.com" <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Peter,

Thanks for the information!

Although the bug to which you refer does mention the SysML move to Extras, it does not directly address the need that Papyrus-RT should be installed with the minimum of plugins required and especially no additional DSL/DSML, etc. that is not required.

This also brings up a missed requirement for a minimal (optimized) Papyrus-RT default installation.

This further highlights the need for a minimal Papyrus configuration that can be used as a base for any DSML.

Sincerely,

Charles Rivet
Senior Product Manager
charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 2016.03.29, at 04:29 , Peter Cigéhn <peter.cigehn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi Charles,

I assume that, as soon as we have moved over to Neon, the dependency to SysML will have been removed. I do know that the latest nightly builds of Neon for base Papyrus, the dependency to SysML have been removed (SysML 1.1 is moved to extras as an optional component). I actually wrote a Bugzilla related to this here: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=490298

Eventually, I would only expect UML-RT to be included under the DSML heading in Papyrus-RT.

/Peter Cigéhn

On 25 March 2016 at 14:42, charles+zeligsoft.com <charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From a product point of view, I wonder why there appears to be a dependency on SysML in Papyrus-RT.

The default installation of Papyrus-RT should only require the base UML capability. I would think that, for Papyrus-RT, SysML should be an optional component. Especially since we do not currently have a “system modeler” actor defined for the tool and SysML is not part of the Papyrus-RT MVP for v1.0.

Sincerely,

Charles Rivet
Senior Product Manager, Eclipse Papyrus-RT Product Manager

Zeligsoft

charles@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On 2016.03.25, at 06:19 , LE FEVRE FRANCOIS <francois.le-fevre@xxxxxx> wrote:

Dear all,

I have look a little at Papyrus-rt project due to a problem of quality profile activation to have the sonar analysis.[1]

To “solve” the bug [1] in SysML we have extracted the product/p2/rcptt/rcpttest from the default profile.

I would like to know if this proposition make sense for you?

 

Francois

 

[1]: https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=490420

 

 

 

 

_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev

_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev

_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail