Re: [papyrus-rt-dev] Update of the profile and update version numbers

[Peter Cigéhn <peter.cigehn@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi,

I have tried to look at changes in Gerrit, but I am not sure I can see the change related to the discussion in the following Bugzilla:

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=464249#c15

Ansgar have made some improvements to the DMSL Validation tooling regarding how the messages gets formatted. I would have expected the new <<MessageHandling>> stereotype to have been applied, with the property "messageMode" set to "NameIsMessage" (if I understood Ansgar correctly regarding how this new feature should be used for the UML-RT profile). But maybe that new feature is only available in the DSML Validation tooling on the Neon track?

The current naming of the actual error message with the "... not valid" is rather confusing (as discussed also in https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=464387#c14).

So I was just expecting the improvement Ansgar made to be included in this update of the profile. But maybe we have to wait until we are on the Neon track to get these improvements included in Papyrus-RT?

One very minor comment: I am not used to write OCL so I am not sure what conventions normally are used. But I can see that you have written the multiplicity constraint for capsule parts without spaces around ">", whereas Bran in his proposal had spaces. I guess these are things that an OCL expert will find "annoying" if the convention normally is to use spaces around ">" (you have used spaces around "=").

/Peter Cigéhn

On 9 December 2015 at 12:24, SCHNEKENBURGER Remi 211865 <Remi.SCHNEKENBURGER@xxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

 

I pushed on gerrit an updated version of the profile [1]. That will be the first step of the general update to version 0.8.0 of Papyrus-RT.

 

Before continuing the update of the version numbers to 0.8.0, could you have a look to the new profile version and check if everything is OK for you?

Tomorrow, I will update the version numbers. I initially planned to update all the version numbers of the plugins / features doing a basic search and replace. Do you all agree to that update, also for codegen and xtumlrt plugins ? There will probably be some issues on the build system, as there could be in the Hudson job configurations some references to 0.7.1 versions I do not see. Is the timing OK for you to have the update tomorrow or would you like to wait another time frame?

 

Regards,

Rémi

 

[1] https://git.eclipse.org/r/#/c/62285/

 

-------------------------------------------------------

 

Rémi SCHNEKENBURGER

+33 (0)1 69 08 48 48

CEA Saclay Nano-INNOV

Institut CARNOT CEA LIST

 

www.eclipse.org/papyrus

 

_______________________________________________
papyrus-rt-dev mailing list
papyrus-rt-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/papyrus-rt-dev