[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
|
Re: [mdt-papyrus.dev] emf validation in Papyrus
|
Dear Ansgar,
thank you for your reply. I asked about the status of the emf
validation in Papyrus for the following reason:
At the moment i'm working on the CHESS project which relies on the
Papyrus editor. In this project we have defined an UML profile and
several constraints (in OCL and Java) that have to be applied during
the validation of models that comply with our profile.
What we whished to know is how we could link our constraints with your
validation, according to the current implementation of Papyrus.
Thanks for your attention,
Best Regards,
Nicholas
2010/12/24, RADERMACHER Ansgar 206501 <Ansgar.RADERMACHER@xxxxxx>:
>
> Dear Nicholas,
>
> I'm not very happy using the internal function, I principally wanted to
> avoid to duplicate code that is already present. For additional constraints,
> we use the standard EMF extension point, i.e. in the moment I do not see a
> need to customize the EValidatorAdapter.
> => could it be made a non-internal function?
> The alternative is to create a minimal EValidatorAdapter in Papyrus.
>
> Btw. I also use the internal Modisco class LinkItem in function
> tryChildIfEmpty() of class ValidationTool: in order to know, if it should be
> decorated with a marker, I need to know the EObject of the childs.
> => is there a cleaner way to get the information about the childs?
> => if not, could LinkItem be made non-internal?
>
> Have a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!
>
> Ansgar
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: mdt-papyrus.dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Nicholas Pacini
> Sent: Wed 12/22/2010 4:18 PM
> To: mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [mdt-papyrus.dev] emf validation in Papyrus
>
> dear all,
>
> In the current version of Papyrus i noticed that you are using an
> internal class of MoDisco in order to check user-defined rules based
> on the emf.validation.constraintProviders extension point.
> I was wondering, if possible, if you intend to keep this
> implementation or if you are going to develop a custom
> EValidatorAdapter within Papyrus in order to add other constraints
> without touching a MoDisco plugin.
>
> thanks in advance,
> best regards,
>
> Nicholas
> _______________________________________________
> mdt-papyrus.dev mailing list
> mdt-papyrus.dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/mdt-papyrus.dev
>
>
