Hi Stephan,
The version of the sphinx proposal that was uploaded
on the Eclipse web site as a project proposal (http://www.eclipse.org/proposals/sphinx/)
is not in line with the content of the last proposal I sent you last Wednesday.
I cc this document to this email as a reminder.
According to what we said last Wednesday, the process
for finalizing the proposal was:
1 – you should have sent me two versions of
this proposal integrating my comments and the one of Cedric: 1 short version
that was intended to be the official proposal, and a longest (the one cc this email
and possibly modified by you).
2 – then I should have reviewed this shortest
version and then say if I am ok or if I need some final modifications.
But you have skipped this second stage and then you
did not give me any time to agree on the final version post on the Eclipse web
site and you did not give the time to consult the Papyrus team to have their final
agreement also!
For that reason, I ask you to ask Eclipse to withdraw
the current version of the proposal from the Eclipse web site and then to send
me the version of the doc used for the publication. It will give a chance to me
and the Papyrus team to provide our comments and agreement.
Thanks,
Best… Sébastien.
Dr. Sébastien Gérard
Head of MDD for DRES research project
CEA LIST, Laboratoire d’Ingénierie dirigée par les
modèles pour les Systèmes Embarqués (LISE)
Boîte courrier 94, GIF SUR YVETTE
CEDEX, F-91191 France
Phone/fax : +33 1 69 08 58 24 / 83 95
Leader of the Eclipse Component Papyrus (The UML2
Graphical Modeler): www.papyrusuml.org
http://www.eclipse.org/modeling/mdt/?project=papyrus
Before printing, think about the environment