Re: [technology-pmc] CQs requiring PMC intervention

[Jody Garnett <jody.garnett@xxxxxxxxx>]

Is the PMC membership list accurate?

http://www.locationtech.org/projects/technology/who

That does not look especially accurate .. perhaps it was bootstrapped from when uDig was the only project last year?

Should anybody be removed or added?

I think it should be updated to list the project leads of each project.

We could also remove non active members (Jesse for example is not active).

Second... have we given any consideration as to who from the PMC can represent the project on the Eclipse Architecture and Planning Councils.

The subject was brought up, no resolution reached.

While I crashed an Architecture meeting to ask a question on maven repository use. I would refer to focus on project incubation.

8434    spatial4j Version: 0.4.1
This one is not actually required. Use of LocationTech project code is permitted. The wrinkle is that Spatial4J's initial contribution needs to be approved before GeoMesa can use it in builds. I'd like to keep it open so that we're reminded that this dependency exists.

Perhaps +1 this and allow IP team to choose an order (or mark duplicate). 

8666    GeoMesa build-and-test-only dependencies Version: various
We have an open discussion on the PMC list regarding the declaration of GeoMesa build and test dependencies. I think that discussion may have run its course, but we need to leave it open until either all PMC members vote or a minimum of a week passes (thereby giving all PMC members reasonable opportunity to vote).

I am content with the build and test dependencies, still stuck on implementation of GPL interface. I would be happy if implementing a GPL interface is permissible as it would help the GeoGig project.

 

8742    Apache Wicket Version: 1.4.12
8743    Spring Framework WebMVC Version: 3.1.4.RELEASE
I don't think that these are required. Comments on the CQ indicate that these are dependencies of GeoServer that are not otherwise used by the project code. If this is the case, then they can be withdrawn. I've added comments to this effect.

If the goal is to implement a custom UI page then these dependences may be providing annotations.

8744    GeoServer (subset) Version: 2.5.2
We have an ongoing discussion and open question on this one. I've asked the IP Team about Jody's concerns regarding the implementation of GPL licensed interfaces. I have some follow up to do with the IP team and will report back when I have news.

Thanks Wayne, I am curious not concerned :)