Hola Amelia,
Thanks for responding!
I have bias feedback on how the window to receive feedback ought to be set up.
Bare with me and thanks for brainstorming after you consume this message.
If an issue/PR is sent on Friday, do we expect the contributors to work on it over the weekend?
I agree that we do not want them to work on it over the weekend.
Should we assume that contributions ought to happen during the work week instead?
+1
WHY?
the 72 hours period for example ought not to contain the wknd.
I'm not aware of any problems with promoting multiple versions of a TCK, however there could be time constraints that dictate whether to promote a specific TCK again.
We as a community can contribute any day we choose to, HOWEVER we ought to be aware AND PROTECTIVE that weekends for many of us are free of professional work-devices.
Another advantage of emailing all SPEC API contributors now is that we don't yet have issues for all of the SPEC API TCKs created yet, so sending a generic email to all could help get the message out sooner so the TCK documentation pull requests can come in sooner.
As such, I would recommend that the August 4th gets moved to later to honor that weekend ought not to be included (yet are awesome plus to have) on the window to contribute.
Also of importance is to keep the SPEC API ballots moving along and not getting blocked on the promotion of TCKs, as well as not getting blocked on the TCK team creating the tracking issues for promoting TCKs.
So, if we delay the August 4th TCK promotions until August 6th and send generic email today to all of the SPEC API mailing lists to review their respective staged TCK zips (and create pull requests on
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck for further changes that are needed), that might be more helpful.
The following schedule (from Ed's original email from this thread) is what we are trying to achieve with regard to promoting the TCKs:
"
Wave 0 (Any time)
- Concurrency
- Messaging
- Persistence
- (From the Platform TCK)
Wave 1 (Any time)
- Annotations
- _expression_ Language
- JSON Processing
- Servlet
- SOAP with Attachments
- WebSocket
Wave 2 (Planned to start July 28)
- Authentication
- Authorization
- JSON Binding
- Server Pages
Wave 3 (Planned to start Aug 5)
Wave 4 (Planned to start Aug 11)
- RESTful Web Services
- Transaction
Wave 5 (Planned to start Aug 18)
- Connectors
- Standard Tag Library
- (From the Platform TCK)
- Enterprise Beans
- Enterprise Web Services
Wave 6 (Planned to start Aug 25
Wave 7 (Planned to start Aug 31)
- Jakarta EE Web Profile
- Jakarta EE Platform
"
Stay awesome formidable #ossDOER and happy August to everyone here,
Thanks, you too! :-)
Scott
The committer teams need to review the staged TCK content and give their
+1 for the relevant TCK bundle to be promoted. The promotion will
freeze the TCK for release, which essentially means it is frozen. If a
blocking change in a TCK is needed, we will re-release with a
incremented version number as mentioned below.
The possible states that TCKs can transition through are:
* Staged via
https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/jakartaee9-eftl/staged-900
(each TCK zip may be updated multiple times).
* Promoted via
https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/jakartaee9-eftl/promoted
(each versioned TCK zip is frozen immediately, further changes can only
appear via a version number increment).
* Final release for Jakarta EE 9 via
https://download.eclipse.org/jakartaee/...
On 7/27/20 11:21 AM, Ed Bratt wrote:
> Due to how the Specification Committee has defined the process, any
> change to the TCK requires are re-release -- Docs. change, Exclude List
> change, anything else that would change content and/or generate a build
> forces a version number increment.
>
> I think the procedures described below will allow us to stop builds,
> once a Specification has gone to ballot. So, that's my first concern. We
> just need to follow the ballot progress closely and not inadvertently
> create an update that wasn't asked for.
From a process point of view, I think that the SPEC API
representative/lead/committers can help determine when it is time for
the relevant TCK to transition from Staged to Promoted state.
Question, if we don't hear feedback from a SPEC lead or committers, who
can make the decision to proceed with Promoting the TCK? Also how long
should we wait for feedback?
There is no perfect amount of time to wait for feedback, if we make it too short, we may need to stage/promote a newer standalone TCK version for further changes. If we make it too long, we may never hear feedback and could jeopardize the EE 9 schedule.
I'm thinking that we can wait a few days after pinging the SPEC API teams (whether it is sending email or pinging lead(s)).
Worse case, we could later stage a jakarta-annotations-tck-2.0.1.zip if further TCK pull requests for documentation changes are important.
Scott
Good news, it is now time for Staged jakarta-annotations-tck-2.0.0.zip
to be reviewed via
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/issues/382. Feedback is
welcome (link to staged TCK zip is in the issue)!
Also good news, it is now time for Staged
jakarta-_expression_-language-tck-4.0.0.zip to be reviewed via
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/issues/387.
Once the relevant SPEC API lead and/or committers has given their
approval via the relevant jakartaee-tck issue, we will Promote the
related TCK.
We have created some other similar "Review and promote " tracking issues
for other TCKs but help is needed to created tracking issues for other
TCKs still (open
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+Review+and+promote
for current issues).
Scott
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
