Re: [jakartaee-tck-dev] Discussion on stand alone TCKs as part of the ce

[Bill Shannon <bill.shannon@xxxxxxxxxx>]

My understanding is that all of these non-Oracle-led APIs and TCKs are in
the process of being contributed to Eclipse.

Jan Supol wrote on 6/25/19 12:46 PM:
> Hi Scott,
> 
> Websocket 1.0 Specification has been part of Java EE 7, Websocket 1.1 was
> released later in between Java EE 7 and Java EE 8. So Websocket 1.1 Spec was not
> part of Java EE 7, but definitely it was part of Java EE 8, and Websocket 1.1
> TCK tests were part of CTS 8 (and Jakarta EE TCK).
> 
> For any application server to claim compatibility with Java EE 8, the
> application server had to pass all the CTS (Java EE TCK) tests. CDI, Bean
> Validation and Java Batch were led outside of Oracle and the vendors were
> responsible  for the respective TCKs. For claiming the compatibility with Java
> EE 8, the application servers had to pass the CDI, BV, and Java Batch TCKs, too.
> 
> Now, the CDI api is not in the Eclipse EE4J github repository, and I do not see
> the CDI TCK there either. So more than thinking about "over lap", I would think
> about the APIs (and respective TCKs) that were part of Java EE 8, but were not
> contributed to Jakarta EE.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jan
> 
> 
> On 25.06.2019 20:51, Scott Highbarger wrote:
>>
>> Some of the recent discussions on stand alone TCKs got me to wondering what if
>> any are we going to require as part of the Jakarta certification process? Is
>> the jakartaeetck the only hard requirement and the stand alone TCKs additional
>> for extra features/implementations? Many of the stand alone TCKs clearly have
>> over lap with the jakartaeetck but specifically I've been thinking of this in
>> the context of areas like the CDI 2.0 TCK and websocket 1.1 etc. which do not
>> have as much over lap.
>> The CDI 2.0 was technically part of the EE8 Spec, while I believe the
>> websocket 1.1 level was not. I'm wondering what the rest of the community is
>> thinking in regards to these stand alone TCKs that don't directly over lap the
>> jakartaeetck?
>>
>>
>> Scott E. Highbarger
>> [_shighbar@xxxxxx.com_ <mailto:shighbar@xxxxxxxxxx>]
>> Advisory Software Engineer
>> WebSphere Application Server CTS
>> IBM Software Group
>> (303) 773-5264
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
>> jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
>> this list, visit
>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev
> _______________________________________________
> jakartaee-tck-dev mailing list
> jakartaee-tck-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from
> this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-tck-dev