From:
David Blevins
dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Tuesday, July 11, 2023 at 20:37
On Jul 11, 2023, at 4:40 PM, Edward Burns via jakartaee-platform-dev <jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: - At the end of the DISCUSS thread, send new emails to point to the chosen ranked choice polling tool to conduct the ballots. I plan to have two ballots, in sequence, that allow voters to rank their
desired choices.
-
In/Out for all possible combinations of MVC, Data, JNoSQL, without regard to which platform spec they will go into.
-
With the winners from the In/Out ballot, another ballot that determines what platform spec they will go into.
-
I'll let the voting go for one week.
I’m a huge supporter of ranked-choice voting for things where there is a limit to how many winners there can be. In this case, we’re not constrained and “no winners” needs to be a valid option. I.e. if people can only cast votes for a spec to be included and can’t vote against a spec being included, how would that work? edburns: I was thinking the ballot should consist of all the possible choices of {MVC, Data, JNoSQL, and none}, similar to the
distinguishable balls in indistinguishable boxes problem. Voters would then rank their choices and the winner would be selected. For example, {none, none, none} is a valid vote. Yes, the ballot would be long, but that’s not a problem.
So the intent would be to have a single ranked-choice vote with these options?
Data_yes JNoSQL_yes MVC_yes Data_yes JNoSQL_yes MVC_no Data_yes JNoSQL_no MVC_yes Data_yes JNoSQL_no MVC_no Data_no JNoSQL_yes MVC_yes Data_no JNoSQL_yes MVC_no Data_no JNoSQL_no MVC_yes Data_no JNoSQL_no MVC_no
(making sure I understand before commenting)
-David
|