Re: [jakartaee-platform-dev] [POLL] Would you support the as-is javax JA

[Dennis Gesker <dennis@xxxxxxxxxx>]

a) would seem to be a good choice

On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 3:00 AM David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

An informal poll for the implementations.  I think we might be all saying the same thing differently.

Let's say that Jakarta EE 9 doesn't "include" JAXB, JAX-WS or Activation, whatever "include" means.

Will you then:

 a) leave the `javax` versions of JAXB, JAX-WS, Activation in your future Jakarta EE 9 implementation
 b) put the work into removing `javax` versions of JAXB, JAX-WS, Activation and ship your future Jakarta EE 9 implementation without them


--
David Blevins
http://twitter.com/dblevins
http://www.tomitribe.com
310-633-3852

_______________________________________________
jakartaee-platform-dev mailing list
jakartaee-platform-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakartaee-platform-dev

--

Dennis R. Gesker

“Be without fear in the face of your enemies. Be brave and upright that God may love thee. Speak the truth always, even if it leads to your death. Safeguard the helpless and do no wrong – that is your oath.” -The Knight’s Oath (Kingdom of Heaven)