Re: [jakarta.ee-community] Fork Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Ja

[Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx>]

I guess your colleague Heiko mentioned most of the possible reasons.

I was under the impression, that most IP questions were already cleared up and both could consume each other where a spec is mature enough and does not keep changing all the time, but maybe something else came up again (other than April 1;-)

Werner

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:54 PM Cesar Saavedra <csaavedr@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If it's stable enough for your project, why not just consume it as is?

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 10:49 AM Heiko W. Rupp <hrupp@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 1 Apr 2020, at 16:34, Otavio Santana wrote:


> My question is: Does it make sense if we create a fork of Eclipse
> MicroProfile Configuration as Jakarta Configuration?

That is a nice Aprils fool of you :-)

> The project seems stable and it will valuable to several projects such
> as JPA, JMS, and NoSQL.

Is(n't) the main obstacle of just including it that MicroProfile does
not have the IP
protection has, as it does not use the Eclipse Spec Process? If so, I
guess just
waiting on that Process to be used may be as good/quick as a fork and
would
prevent the two from drifting apart. Or that contributors have to
constantly
submit changes to two projects.

But I am sure I am missing some things

   Heiko

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-community mailing list
jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-community

--

Cesar Saavedra

Senior Principal Technical Product Marketing Manager

csaavedr@xxxxxxxxxx

(407) 492-9801

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-community mailing list
jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-community