Re: [jakarta.ee-community] Fork Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Ja

[Werner Keil <werner.keil@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi Otavio,

Thanks for the suggestion. Will try to raise it in the Spec Committee to see, what others think.

Technically it may not be a big issue and the license also won't permit it, but as long as vendors already baked MP Config into some of their products (IBM, Red Hat and I believe even TomEE could use it somewhere) it requires some care if it's even a necessary step.

Why would you consider changing it, only for the namespace?

Regards,

Werner 

On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 4:35 PM Otavio Santana <otaviopolianasantana@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hello everyone, I sent this discussion about the total integration of MicroProfile and Jakarta and I understood that it is not possible.

My question is: Does it make sense if we create a fork of Eclipse MicroProfile Configuration as Jakarta Configuration?
The project seems stable and it will valuable to several projects such as JPA, JMS, and NoSQL.
I wrote a draft proposal about it, please, let me know what do you think about it.

• A draft Proposal: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O2rWD9eX9UiBM5KXpa9IM7zu7IK0C2401of88bmery0/edit?usp=sharing
• The thread of the previous discussion: https://www.eclipse.org/lists/jakartaee-spec-project-leads/msg00282.html

-- 

Otávio Santana

twitter: http://twitter.com/otaviojava

site:     http://about.me/otaviojava

_______________________________________________
jakarta.ee-community mailing list
jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/jakarta.ee-community