I would recommend writing out the abbreviations used under
Wayne's section. It's likely only the Spec. committee and maybe a
few of the other committee members will know what EFSP and JESP
stand for.
Amelia seemed to be suggesting that we establish a mechanism for
community members to raise topics -- with maybe a preference for
topics which the community would take ownership of (I'm not sure
if I'm getting it right).
How should this work, going forward. Is the working group
"managed" by any of the existing committees? I think Paul made
some reference to the PMC though I am not clear if this was just
with respect to getting topics and/or presenters. I am still
trying to understand the current intentions around the meeting.
Should the marketing committee have any role in the production of
this monthly meeting?
Hello All,
I am very sorry for not being able to attend the marketing call
yesterday, as I would love to discuss further the current
situation with the monthly WG calls. I thank you for your
feedback! It was communicated to last couple of specification
committee and / or steering committee calls that we had NO
attendance on the last call - concerning and disappointing.
Here are my note about the call and issues with the call
Here is what we have in place so far:
- Jakarta EE Working Group Calendar is set up with a monthly
calls, last Wednesday 11 AM EST each month.
- The Calendar link is shared with jakarta.ee-wg@xxxxxxxxxxx, that
should have all Jakarta EE members signed up as well as
broader audience as the mailing list is public
- Calendar notifications about the call are set up
- Separate email as reminder to the is sent to the mailing
list a couple of days ahead
Here are issues / suggestions on how we can improve:
- WG members may not be aware of the call or may not be aware
of the purpose of the calls
- We should consider changing the call Title. Suggestion Jakarta
EE Monthly Status Update
- We should improve the description and expand the Agenda
closer to the call - not just provide link to the document
- We should send an individual email to all Jakarta EE company
members inviting them to attend and participate and
further invite interested parties from their companies
- With the new title we should consider opening the call to
the community jakarta.ee-community@xxxxxxxxxxx
- I am in favor of this.
Our next call is scheduled for March 27th, and I would like to
have the similar agenda as in Feb
Jakarta EE updates from the Foundation (Paul Buck / Tanja Obradovic - Eclipse Foundation)
Update on the Specification Process (Wayne Beaton - Eclipse Foundation)
PMC / Projects Update (Ivar Grimstad - Principal Consultant, Cybercom Sweden)
Marketing Update (Michael DeNicola - Fujitsu)
I will likely work this call on the Monday and implement the
above suggestion, so by mid / late week title and invites are
corrected.
Please let me know if anything else should be considered for
this call.
Thanks all for being vocal and persistent.
Best,
Tanja
On 2019-03-14 7:37 p.m., Amelia Eiras
wrote:
uesting
quotes and blogs was still getting requests to participate on
the GlassFish release document from back Jan to now. (closed now
to public b/c of those incoming requests) Though the document
was transferred to EF wonderful team and I do not follow up on
those requests, It is important to note that the chosen openness
to that release was healthy and positively received.
--
Tanja Obradovic
Jakarta EE Program Manager | Eclipse Foundation, Inc.
Twitter: @TanjaEclipse
Eclipse Foundation: The Platform for Open Innovation and Collaboration
|
This email has been checked for
viruses by Avast antivirus software.
www.avast.com
|