| Hi Benjamin,
a single PMC members can +1 on behalf of the PMC
This is how we actually do it. The only exception are the CQs that require a discussion (works-with and prerequisite) - for which we have set a „timeout“ of 7 days to allow all PMC members to participate in it.
there is of course still the possibility for anyone to -1 should there be an issue or disagreement with the CQ.
Yes, and this is why we give people 7 days as we cannot expect everyone to be available all the time. I agree that ideally every PMC member should answer asap, so that the 7 day period is a rare exception to the rule.
Regards, Kai
Hi,
I am not sure why and when we decided to go for a rule where all PMC members have to +1 CQ's (and at least have no -1 for 7 days after the vote started) but I would like to suggest we change the rule so that a single PMC members can +1 on behalf of the PMC (assuming the PMC member in question is not a committer on the project). AFAICT many other PMCs do the same, and there is of course still the possibility for anyone to -1 should there be an issue or disagreement with the CQ. CQs are already eating up a lot of time for everyone so I think we should try to be more efficient in how we handle them.
Thoughts? Benjamin –
_______________________________________________ iot-pmc mailing list iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxTo change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc
|
