Re: [iot-pmc] Voting on CQs

[Jens Reimann <jreimann@xxxxxxxxxx>]

We have such a rule only for works-with CQ, where we are encouraged to have a public discussion around those CQs. If they are works-with or pre-req.

For general CQs we just give a +1.

Or did I get something wrong?

On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Benjamin Cabé <benjamin@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi,

I am not sure why and when we decided to go for a rule where all PMC members have to +1 CQ's (and at least have no -1 for 7 days after the vote started) but I would like to suggest we change the rule so that a single PMC members can +1 on behalf of the PMC (assuming the PMC member in question is not a committer on the project). AFAICT many other PMCs do the same, and there is of course still the possibility for anyone to -1 should there be an issue or disagreement with the CQ.

CQs are already eating up a lot of time for everyone so I think we should try to be more efficient in how we handle them.

Thoughts?

Benjamin –

_______________________________________________
iot-pmc mailing list
iot-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/iot-pmc

--

Jens Reimann
Senior Software Engineer / EMEA ENG Middleware
Werner-von-Siemens-Ring 14
85630 Grasbrunn
Germany
phone: +49 89 2050 71286
_____________________________________________________________________________

Red Hat GmbH, www.de.redhat.com,
Registered seat: Grasbrunn, Commercial register: Amtsgericht Muenchen, HRB 153243,
Managing Directors: Paul Argiry, Charles Cachera, Michael Cunningham, Michael O'Neill