Re: [hono-dev] Commands using the HTTP adapter

["Frank Karsten (INST/ECS4)" <Karsten.Frank2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

> >
> > IMHO why not just always support the "no command-message"?
> >
> > If a "tenant manager" knows that it does not want the immediate
> > response to a request, the applications (that belong to himself) would
> > just not send the "no command-message". And then the PA will wait
> > until ttd expired, giving the chance to other application instances to
> > send a command during this time frame.
> >
> > So, no extra tenant-parameter - just use the "no command-message"
> > inside the applications belonging to the tenant, or _not_ use it.
> >
> > Would you agree to this?
> >
> 
> My concern would be that while an organization might find it easy to control that
> only a single application is allowed to use the tenant, it might be more difficult to
> prevent the addition of a malevolent application if there are already many
> applications being allowed to connect.
> 
> In addition to that, FMPOV the default behavior should be the safe variant which
> will always work and only allow explicit optimization in cases where the
> administrator knows exactly what he is doing.


I see your point now and agree to this - let's go for the tenant configuration variant then.
I will provide an implementation issue for it.

Thanks for the good discussion!