Skip to main content
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [List Home]
Re: [glassfish-dev] question about which XML Binding 4.0 TCK job is used for validating that GlassFish still passes the TCK
Hi,

Thanks for bringing this up. The XML Binding TCK, being optional (I guess), was not moved to the default set of TCK tests for Jakarta EE 10 that are executed. Optional or not, we should at least reference this in that set of tests and make it a choice to run or not. 

Kind regards,
Arjan Tijms




On Sun, 29 Oct 2023 at 17:27, Petr Aubrecht via glassfish-dev <glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Thank you, Scott!

We (Payara) discovered the issue as well. Also the dependency on version of Java, but I was quite confused, that it depends on minor version of Java 11(!).

Petr


On 10/26/23 18:26, Scott Marlow via glassfish-dev wrote:
FYI, the TCK challenge is https://github.com/jakartaee/jaxb-tck/issues/82 and the workaround is to use an older JDK (in case you hit the same issue).

Scott

On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 9:31 AM Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I'm not questioning GlassFish, more that I was trying to understand why WildFly was seeing a TCK failure not yet discussed.  We will be creating a TCK challenge for the XML Binding 4.0 TCK which is related to a JDK 17/11 bug fix that causes a few XML Binding TCK tests to fail.  I no longer need an answer to my question below.  

For reference our notes on what previously passed during the EE 10 development process is here https://github.com/jakartaee/platform-tck/wiki/Jakarta-EE-10.0-TCK-results-for-Glassfish

Thanks,
Scott

On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 3:30 PM Scott Marlow <smarlow@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I tried looking at the test results for
> https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/jaxb-tck/job/master/180/ and
> noticed that the XML Binding TCK tests were not run.  I'm trying to
> understand if this could be a problem with:
>
> 1.  The https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/jaxb-tck/job/master
> job (I reran it this week and saw the same results but perhaps the
> parameters need updating).
> 2.  The XML Binding 4.0 TCK.
> 3.  GlassFish.
>
> Does anyone else know of a different CI job setup for validating that
> GlassFish still passes the XML Binding TCK?  Perhaps GlassFish is
> including a XML Binding implementation that has already passed the XML
> Binding TCK in which case likely wouldn't need to run it again.
>
> Scott

_______________________________________________
glassfish-dev mailing list
glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/glassfish-dev
_______________________________________________
glassfish-dev mailing list
glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/glassfish-dev

Back to the top