CC Ondre, Piotr
On 01/03/22, 6:24 PM, "Alwin Joseph" <alwin.joseph@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Ondrej,
Piotrek is right.
1. The latest Messaging TCK has 4 meta data test failures with Glassfish M2. Test run logs [1] for the latest TCK at [2].
2. The signature file need to be updated , but we faced an issue as mentioned at [3] while resolving the jms api 3.1 dependency.
[1]
https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/jakartaee-tck/job/master/1667/artifact/jmstck.log
[2]
https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/jakartaee10/staged/eftl/jakarta-messaging-tck-3.1.0.zip
[3]
https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/pull/868#discussion_r816026920
Thanks & Regards,
Alwin Joseph
On 01/03/22, 5:47 PM, "glassfish-dev on behalf of Piotr Żygieło" <glassfish-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of piotr.zygielo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 1 Mar 2022 at 12:42, Ondrej Mihályi <ondrej.mihalyi@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I'm in the process of releasing Messaging 3.1 and for that I've submitted a certification request for GlassFish 7 Milestone 2:
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://github.com/jakartaee/messaging/issues/321__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Zlt5xX4FnZCIPe7Lb_9Nts21tk_ZiskdvcB5PgLlzQtAOtCUwmiELkSTlYE_GLw1xA$
>
> I ran the standalone TCK using a Jenkins job (
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ci.eclipse.org/messaging/job/2_messaging-run-tck-against-staged-build/12/__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Zlt5xX4FnZCIPe7Lb_9Nts21tk_ZiskdvcB5PgLlzQtAOtCUwmiELkSTlYG8yWaqkA$
) and the TCK passed.
Just to make it clear - against "private"
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/jakartaee-tck-scottmarlow/job/OndroMih-jms-299-300-tests-repeated-annotations/3/artifact/standalone-bundles/messaging-tck-3.1.0.zip__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Zlt5xX4FnZCIPe7Lb_9Nts21tk_ZiskdvcB5PgLlzQtAOtCUwmiELkSTlYHhU703Ug$
But do not be misled.
- TCK has not updated signature file yet,
- Scott's bundle has no PR 825 I suppose
and yet - the sig test and metadata/version tests passed because:
- OpenMQ in GF-M2 has no JMS3.1, but 3.0 still
GF 7M2 isn't JMS 3.1 compliant, and I find this certification request premature.
--
Piotrek
_______________________________________________
glassfish-dev mailing list
glassfish-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/glassfish-dev__;!!ACWV5N9M2RV99hQ!Zlt5xX4FnZCIPe7Lb_9Nts21tk_ZiskdvcB5PgLlzQtAOtCUwmiELkSTlYHCnKvmdw$