Re: [gemoc-dev] names for new repositories

[Benoit Combemale <benoit.combemale@xxxxxxx>]

You should ask Eclipse for the repo, probably in the same bug? 

> Le 14 nov. 2018 à 17:23, Didier Vojtisek <didier.vojtisek@xxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> 
> perfect, let's go
> 
> https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=541160
> 
> Didier
> 
> 
> Le 14/11/2018 à 17:19, Erwan Bousse a écrit :
>> Le mercredi 14 novembre 2018 à 17:03 +0100, Benoit Combemale a écrit :
>>> Hi all,
>>> 
>>> To mimic the naming of namespaces, what about :
>>> - gemoc-studio-execution-ale
>>> - gemoc-studio-execution-java
>> +1, it's nice to have a common prefix!
>> 
>> And I'm overall very much in favor of having a dedicated repo for the Java engine, to cleanly isolate it at the repo level from the framework it
>> relies upon. This can be part of making the life of new engine contributors easier.
>> 
>> In fact I would almost prefer to call it "gemoc-studio-execution-k3" because at the moment it's (still) rather k3 specific, and I believe we could aim
>> someday to have a real Java engine that would rely on automated instrumentation and/or jdb to control pure Java code… but that's another story :).
>> Let's go with gemoc-studio-execution-java to remain consistent with the current naming.
>> 
>> 
>> Thanks Didier!
>> Erwan
>> 
>>> For the second question, I would argue to ask Eclipse themselves if they prefer to create it now (at the time we create new ones), or if this is
>>> something doable later, when it will become important to do it.
>>> 
>>> Thanks!
>>> benoit
>>> 
>>>> Le 14 nov. 2018 à 10:23, Didier Vojtisek <didier.vojtisek@xxxxxxxx> a écrit :
>>>> 
>>>> Hi all
>>>> 
>>>> as part of https://github.com/eclipse/gemoc-studio/issues/119  (integration of ALE) I plan to take the opportunity  to also contribute to
>>>> https://github.com/eclipse/gemoc-studio/issues/97 (Ie. better split component and use dedicated repo)
>>>> 
>>>> so I plan to ask for 2 new repositories: (or tell Benoit as the project leader to ask ;-)  )
>>>> - gemoc-studio-ale-execution  which will contain ALE engines (interpreted first but also compiled versions when available)
>>>> - gemoc-studio-java-execution which will contain the current java+k3 engine   (ie. move gemoc-studio-modeldebugging/java_execution/ to this new
>>>> repo )
>>>> 
>>>> are these name ok for everybody ?
>>>> 
>>>> as a second question, we may also consider to have our dedicated github organisation and ask eclipse webmaster to move our repositories there,
>>>> this would simplify action as the one above.
>>>> However this action will have much more impacts since the urls will change too (and thus I'm not sure how the forks will behave)
>>>> 
>>>> Didier
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> gemoc-dev mailing list
>>>> gemoc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemoc-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> gemoc-dev mailing list
>>> gemoc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>>> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemoc-dev
> 
> -- 
> Didier Vojtisek
> SED Rennes - DiverSE Team
> Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, IRISA
> Campus de beaulieu
> 35042 Rennes
> 02 99 84 75 07
> 
> _______________________________________________
> gemoc-dev mailing list
> gemoc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemoc-dev