Re: [gemoc-dev] names for new repositories

[Didier Vojtisek <didier.vojtisek@xxxxxxxx>]

perfect, let's go

https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=541160

Didier


Le 14/11/2018 à 17:19, Erwan Bousse a écrit :
> Le mercredi 14 novembre 2018 à 17:03 +0100, Benoit Combemale a écrit :
> > Hi all,
> >
> > To mimic the naming of namespaces, what about :
> > - gemoc-studio-execution-ale
> > - gemoc-studio-execution-java
> +1, it's nice to have a common prefix!
>
> And I'm overall very much in favor of having a dedicated repo for the Java engine, to cleanly isolate it at the repo level from the framework it
> relies upon. This can be part of making the life of new engine contributors easier.
>
> In fact I would almost prefer to call it "gemoc-studio-execution-k3" because at the moment it's (still) rather k3 specific, and I believe we could aim
> someday to have a real Java engine that would rely on automated instrumentation and/or jdb to control pure Java code… but that's another story :).
> Let's go with gemoc-studio-execution-java to remain consistent with the current naming.
>
>
> Thanks Didier!
> Erwan
>
> > For the second question, I would argue to ask Eclipse themselves if they prefer to create it now (at the time we create new ones), or if this is
> > something doable later, when it will become important to do it.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > benoit
> >
> > > Le 14 nov. 2018 à 10:23, Didier Vojtisek <didier.vojtisek@xxxxxxxx> a écrit :
> > >
> > > Hi all
> > >
> > > as part of https://github.com/eclipse/gemoc-studio/issues/119  (integration of ALE) I plan to take the opportunity  to also contribute to
> > > https://github.com/eclipse/gemoc-studio/issues/97 (Ie. better split component and use dedicated repo)
> > >
> > > so I plan to ask for 2 new repositories: (or tell Benoit as the project leader to ask ;-)  )
> > > - gemoc-studio-ale-execution  which will contain ALE engines (interpreted first but also compiled versions when available)
> > > - gemoc-studio-java-execution which will contain the current java+k3 engine   (ie. move gemoc-studio-modeldebugging/java_execution/ to this new
> > > repo )
> > >
> > > are these name ok for everybody ?
> > >
> > > as a second question, we may also consider to have our dedicated github organisation and ask eclipse webmaster to move our repositories there,
> > > this would simplify action as the one above.
> > > However this action will have much more impacts since the urls will change too (and thus I'm not sure how the forks will behave)
> > >
> > > Didier
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > gemoc-dev mailing list
> > > gemoc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> > > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemoc-dev
> > _______________________________________________
> > gemoc-dev mailing list
> > gemoc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
> > To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> > https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemoc-dev

--
Didier Vojtisek
SED Rennes - DiverSE Team
Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, IRISA
Campus de beaulieu
35042 Rennes
02 99 84 75 07