Re: [gemoc-dev] names for new repositories

[Benoit Combemale <benoit.combemale@xxxxxxx>]

Hi all, 

To mimic the naming of namespaces, what about :

- gemoc-studio-execution-ale

- gemoc-studio-execution-java

For the second question, I would argue to ask Eclipse themselves if they prefer to create it now (at the time we create new ones), or if this is something doable later, when it will become important to do it. 

Thanks! 

benoit

Le 14 nov. 2018 à 10:23, Didier Vojtisek <didier.vojtisek@xxxxxxxx> a écrit :

Hi all

as part of https://github.com/eclipse/gemoc-studio/issues/119  (integration of ALE) I plan to take the opportunity  to also contribute to https://github.com/eclipse/gemoc-studio/issues/97 (Ie. better split component and use dedicated repo)

so I plan to ask for 2 new repositories: (or tell Benoit as the project leader to ask ;-)  )
- gemoc-studio-ale-execution  which will contain ALE engines (interpreted first but also compiled versions when available)
- gemoc-studio-java-execution which will contain the current java+k3 engine   (ie. move gemoc-studio-modeldebugging/java_execution/ to this new repo )

are these name ok for everybody ?

as a second question, we may also consider to have our dedicated github organisation and ask eclipse webmaster to move our repositories there, this would simplify action as the one above.
However this action will have much more impacts since the urls will change too (and thus I'm not sure how the forks will behave)

Didier

-- 
Didier Vojtisek
SED Rennes - DiverSE Team
Inria, Univ Rennes, CNRS, IRISA
Campus de beaulieu
35042 Rennes
02 99 84 75 07

_______________________________________________
gemoc-dev mailing list
gemoc-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/gemoc-dev