Re: [ee4j-pmc] Security specs merge

[Guillermo González de Agüero <z06.guillermo@xxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks for the insight. I'm +1 for it as long as we keep the specs separated.

Reding the minutes, I was a bit surprised that it was the PMC who would decide that merge without asking the individual projects. But you've clarified that was more of a casual discussion which is totally right.

Regards,

Guillermo González de Agüero

El sáb., 13 jul. 2019 1:55, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> escribió:

On Jul 12, 2019, at 8:06 AM, Guillermo González de Agüero <z06.guillermo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I was just surprised to see it on the PMC minutes with such a short description.

The topic came up in the context of seeing a lot of needless duplicate admin work.  There was only a brief off the cuff and out of context comment, I recall making to unprepared statements:

 - "These are all the same people, having them all split up is pointless."

 - "Far worse, what if they in the future became different people and started stepping on each other."

Nothing will happen here from the PMC perspective, it was just commentary, but if you all want to put some shape to how that might look, huge +1.

-David

_______________________________________________
ee4j-pmc mailing list
ee4j-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxx
To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
https://www.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/ee4j-pmc