[
Date Prev][
Date Next][
Thread Prev][
Thread Next][
Date Index][
Thread Index]
[
List Home]
Re: [Dltk-dev] DLTK for Scheme
|
re second question:
those are all debugger implementations (they know how to speak the dbgp protocol so they can communicate with the dbgp server) for ruby - the core of the dbgp code already resides in org.eclipse.dltk.debug
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 9:36 AM, William Cook <
william@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi everybody! DLTK looks great... i have some questions:
In one of the presentations on DLTK is asserts that DLTK is not well-suited for Lisp, Scheme or prolog. I can understand why prolog might be a problem, since it has a different notion of stack frames. But what is wrong with Lisp or Scheme? these are traditional stack-based languages (even if they do have closures.. that doesn't matter).
Second question:
It seems that the code for DBGp is in the Ruby branch (and maybe duplicated in other branches?) Why isn't it in the core?
--
William Cook
Assistant Professor
UT Austin Computer Sciences
_______________________________________________
dltk-dev mailing list
dltk-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/dltk-dev
--
-jae