[Dltk-dev] DLTK for Scheme

[William Cook <william@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi everybody! DLTK looks great... i have some questions:

In one of the presentations on DLTK is asserts that DLTK is not 
well-suited for Lisp, Scheme or prolog. I can understand why prolog 
might be a problem, since it has a different notion of stack frames. But 
what is wrong with Lisp or Scheme? these are traditional stack-based 
languages (even if they do have closures.. that doesn't matter).

Second question:
It seems that the code for DBGp is in the Ruby branch (and maybe 
duplicated in other branches?) Why isn't it in the core?

--
William Cook
Assistant Professor
UT Austin Computer Sciences