| [cosmos-dev] UPDATED: COSMOS code reviews for i7 ERs - Management Domain, Broker, and MDRs |
Mark, I have updated the list below with your MDR ERs. Please note that we have the Broker / Management Domain / MDRs covered for now from a planning perspective. The GUI aspects should be defined shortly. And then, post the face-to-face meeting, we need to consider some of the ancillary (yet critical issues) such as Adoptability / Security / etc. Thanks, Jimmy ________________________________ From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Mohsin, Jimmy Sent: Mon 10/8/2007 6:30 PM To: Cosmos Dev Cc: Craddock, Chris; Devine, John T Subject: COSMOS code reviews for i7 ERs - Management Domain, Broker, and MDRs Mark, OK.. how about this as a code-walk through plan: 1. We do code reviews with the COSMOS team on the Broker & the MD ERs for i7. These are the following ERs: i7 COSMOS DC Data Broker extended - COSMOS Bugzilla 204921 i7 COSMOS DC Management Domain - COSMOS Bugzilla 205658 2. May we request to be included in code review on the i7 MDR ERs, that IBM you are doing currently? 204959: Provide reusable CMDBf APIs for adopters that intend to provide a CMDBf query/registration service https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=204959 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=204959> 186247: Expose the SML repository API as a WSDM capability https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=186247 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=186247> 200254: Refactor Navigator and Properties Servlet to integrate with Broker APIs https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=200254 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=200254> 200274: Refactor Navigator and Properties servlet to create CMDBf queries https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=200274 <https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=200274> 3. Per your earlier communication, the i7 UI should be OK, as we have the CA UI sub-team (Monica / JT) working closely with Sheldon Lee Loy. This is TBD; with follow up due from Sheldon Lee Loy / John Todd / Monica Lupu. This is a next week item (week of Oct 15), when we hope to know the exact division of the GUI ERs. 4. We then revisit the efficacy / value of doing these cross-COSMOS code reviews in i8. If no one has any issues, we will add these items to the plans on our side. Thanks, Jimmy Mohsin ________________________________ From: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Mark D Weitzel Sent: Mon 10/8/2007 11:14 AM To: Cosmos Dev Cc: Craddock, Chris; cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx; Devine, John T; cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [cosmos-dev] Code reviews for i7 / i8 <mdw>thoughts in line....</mdw> _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Mark Weitzel | STSM | IBM Software Group | Tivoli | Autonomic Computing | (919) 543 0625 | weitzelm@xxxxxxxxxx [cosmos-dev] Code reviews for i7 / i8 Mohsin, Jimmy to: cosmos-dev 10/07/07 03:05 AM Sent by: cosmos-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxx Cc: "Craddock, Chris", "Devine, John T" Please respond to Cosmos Dev <cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx> ________________________________ Mark & team, Given our current refactoring efforts, I had a thought [that is preventing me from sleeping :-), just kidding, perhaps I am in HAWAII ]... 1. Is it worhtwhile to institute code reviews DURING an iteration itself, as opposed to doing them after an iteration is complete? <mdw>i think this makes sense.</mdw> 2. If you think this is a good idea, we should do this AT LEAST for the "more critical" ERS, i.e. for ERs that have numerous touchpoint in the world of the COSMOS DC. <mdw>agree</mdw> 3. I think this will align the coding with design UPFRONT. Of course, the flip is that we will add some drag to the flight... <mdw>understood, but i think this is a way to help keep us all on the same page.</mdw> Thoughts? Jimmy_______________________________________________ cosmos-dev mailing list cosmos-dev@xxxxxxxxxxx https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev <https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cosmos-dev>
<<winmail.dat>>