Re: [cn4j-alliance] CN4J Technical Call Tuesday??

[John Clingan <jclingan@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Any other comments. Unless I get positive feedback, I plan to cancel tomorrow’s call.

> On Sep 20, 2021, at 12:51 PM, David Blevins <dblevins@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> At the moment I'm not finding the calls terribly useful.  We seem to be ok to talk about things in the abstract, but when a concrete example appears such as MicroProfile Config/Jakarta Config, it's flagged up as inappropriate.  It makes me question the value of the having any abstract technical discussions.
> 
> I think there's value in having abstract and concrete technical discussions, but I think we could benefit from shifting to email for a period.
> 
> 
> -- 
> David Blevins
> http://twitter.com/dblevins
> http://www.tomitribe.com
> 
>> On Sep 17, 2021, at 12:58 PM, John Clingan <jclingan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> We have a couple of topics that we could talk about:
>> 
>> * Namespace
>> * Moving specs between the working groups
>> 
>> However, before I continue to schedule the calls, I’d like to make sure of two things:
>> 
>> 1) The topics are timely and relevant
>> 2) Attendees find these calls useful
>> 
>> Thoughts?
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> cn4j-alliance mailing list
>> cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
>> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
>> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cn4j-alliance mailing list
> cn4j-alliance@xxxxxxxxxxx
> To change your delivery options, retrieve your password, or unsubscribe from this list, visit
> https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/cn4j-alliance